As look as we’re playing along with religious images, we should consider this one:
Hot! (Or so I think.) Found at “Art or Porn: You decide,” which is pretty cool even if I think that the premise that we must decide whether an image is art or porn is daft.
***
Religious imagery how? I think it’s pretty clear that the image is being made after this iconographic tradition:
If freedom means anything, it means freedom to blaspheme. This one explores matters using a theme we’ve seen before here at Erotic Mad Science, and will see again.
Found at the tumblr “Art of an explicit or erotic nature.” Talk about exactly what it says on the tin…
How minimal can one go on monster sex? Pretty minimal, it would seem.
Another from Janitor of Lunacy.
Monster sex generally has a certain appeal, and frequent Erotic Mad Science contributor KristinF does it as well as anyone.
Presented by the kind permission of the artist. Doesn’t the hair (or fur, as the case might be) remind you of leaves this season?
Lon Ryden knows tentacle sex.
By kind permission of the artist. A “sanitized for your protection” version of the image appeared earlier at DeviantArt here.
This rather peculiar magic act is reminiscent of something achieved by the “hyperspatial cinctures” in a certain script I once wrote.
Found at the “Flexible, Invisible” Japanese-language blog which now, sadly, appears to be defunct.
We have a few days before we start the publication of Bridget O’Brian’s sexy adventure in Chapter Two of Study Abroad, and I’ve noticed that we’re closing in on Halloween, which mean that it’s time for our Second Annual Squick or Squee week (or a little less) here at Erotic Mad Science: a time to celebrate images that might leave audience opinion a little bit…divided?
Our first entry this year is from our old friend and interview partner Dr. Robo, who came up with this panel for King of Hooter County p. 52.
Presented by kind permission of the artist. Tasty!
