Cannibalism, death, and resurrection…

…the trope played with in the initial Iris Brockman Study Abroad story turns out to be a lot older than I realized when I wrote it.

(Gerard David c. 1460 – 1528, Zwei Legenden vom heiligen Nikolaus c. 1500.  Found here.)

No, this is not an artistic precognition of a certain unpleasantness that has recently dogged a certain global religious organization.  Rather, it’s a painting about a miracle story involving St. Nicholas, recently invoked by psychologist Jesse Bering (whose intriguing writing on sex I blogged about at ErosBlog a little while back) in a column in Slate about cannibalism.  The story, in Bering’s retelling:

The boys had been killed by a butcher, you see, and their carcasses were salting in a makeshift vat awaiting ingestion by famished townspeople. Fortunately, that most notorious child-lover himself, St. Nicholas, just happened to be passing through town when he caught wind of the boy-eating scandal and resurrected the lads in the tub.

Okay, I guess no one had actually gotten around to eating these tender and tasty-looking lads.  Still, close enough given that it’s religion and all.  Well done, Saint-guy!

Falling to earth

Nicolas Roeg‘s The Man Who Fell To Earth (1976) contains little or nothing in the way of mad science (it does contain copious nudity and sex), but re-watching it recently on a Criterion Collection DVD I did note a certain kind of theme that seems to have influenced me over and over — something that might be called Overcoming the Fear.

A very brief plot summary might help.  An alien world is dying, devastated by planet-wide drought.  One of the planet’s inhabitants, played by David Bowie sees terrestrial television broadcasts depicting a planet brimming with water and resolves to try to get some for his homeworld.  He comes to earth, where he takes the name Thomas Jerome Newton.  Acquiring a series of patents on his world’s superior technology, he becomes a vastly wealthy industrialist as part of his plan to build a spaceship back to his home planet.

Scouting a research location in New Mexico, he meets a lonely hotel worker (played by Candy Clark) named Mary-Lou.   Mary-Lou falls in love with the enigmatic stranger.

Eventually Thomas and Mary-Lou fall into a marriage-like relationship, which entails cohabitation.  And marriage-like fights as well.  When Mary-Lou bitterly denounces her lover as “an alien,” he decides to remove the prostheses which make him look human and reveal his native appearance.

This leads to one serious freak-out on the part of Mary Lou.

Eventually she masters her fear.

And makes her way back to the bedroom where the naked Thomas is lying.

A strange scene occurs, intercut with somewhat hallucinatory footage suggesting erotic between human woman and alien.

 

It doesn’t quite all work out (it is very hard to follow what in the movie is happening on a literal level), but there still something very compelling about what happens here.  Think Nanetta observing the Apsinthion Protocol for the first time, or any number of implied backstories of other characters in the Gnosis College  canon (for example, I’ve never written the Iris backstory in any detail, but I’ll bet her reaction to a proposal of being reduced to dinner and resurrected was not to squee),  and you’ll see what I mean.

Oh, and as a bonus, there’s a hint of liquid girl going on in that last screencap, isn’t there?

New Iris art

It’s a pleasure to be able to present some new Erotic Mad Science bespoke art featuring Iris Brockman from her initial adventure abroad:  an interesting moment in her employment in the Club Cuisine (or, depending on your views on the metaphysics of personal identity, her last moment, although obviously she has full confidence in that that’s not the case).

Creative Commons License
Iris and Samurai by by Hitori, ZEO, & Kurohoshi, commissioned by Dr. Faustus of EroticMadScience.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (Click on the image for a larger version.)

This one was a group effort, with by Hitori, whose highly imaginative work we’ve seen here recently at Erotic Mad Science acting as principal artist with help from his friends ZEO and Kurohoshi who do charming work of their own (follow links to their galleries at DeviantArt).  You can see their joint work at a blog here.

And I do believe they are all open to the idea of future commissions, hint, hint.

One way to cause thug fail

Readers of the EroticMadScience blog in its early days might recall a post on the real-world models for the four studiers-abroad in which I commented that Iris Brockman was a bit more buxom than her model Hedy Lamarr and insisted further that this really was a plot-relevant detail.

See?  It was.  Iris was able to play on the fact that there are certain things for which men (straight ones, anyway) are fools in order to effect the rescue of Cleo.

Well, maybe that all still seems adolescent.  Rather than resist I’ll just play along by throwing in a fake motivational poster that is (I hope) on point.

Found , 1 Comment

A different perspective

I must say I’m still not sure what dark crevice of my mind this bit of dialog in Where Am I? came out of:

TAKAYAMA

Don’t you feel, what is the word? “guilt” at having in effect murdered one of your professors?

iris

Thanks to you and your associates, Mr. Takayama, I have already been dead any number of times. It changes one’s perspective.

TAKAYAMA

Ah, an excellent answer, Miss Brockman.

Or even further and odder the moment where Iris gazes on the petrification device provided by Takayama’s mysterious and somewhat sinister organization and contemplates something awful — to most people.

Iris picks up the camera-petrifying device, which is sitting on her desk, and looks into its business end.

IRIS

(to herself)

It has its appeal, doesn’t it?

But it must be said that even these strange and disturbing thoughts have some sort of science-fiction antecedent.

(My source for this image is the blog Posthuman Blues.) If that isn’t as mad-science as it gets,  I’ll eat my rheostat.  I don’t know much about the story, although the Wikipedia entry on author Paul W. Fairman indicates that the story “The Girl who Loved Death” was published in 1952.  Casual nosing around hasn’t yet turned up a copy of the text of the story (did nobody ever love it?the closest thing to a review I was able to find wasn’t terribly positive) but the cover itself surely speaks volumes.

The 1950s were supposedly a bland and conformist decade, the time of Leave it to Beaver and Ozzie and Harriet, but looking more carefully one finds some very strange stuff back there.

Suborn and petrify

The means through which Iris dispatches Professor Mora once and for all draw on a certain curious A.S.F.R. micro-genre which, for want of a more obvious name, I’ll call the “suborn and petrify panel.”

To make something in the micro-genre, someone takes a picture of a pleasing model (usually female, usually naked or near-to-it) and modifies the image of the main figure (I assume using image software) to make it look like the model’s flesh has turned or is in the process of turning to stone, gold, or some other hard inanimate substance.   One then attaches a micro-narrative to the image, which explains how the figure was gotten out of her clothes in the first place (a pretext, like a modeling assignment or an assignation or just something as simple as taking a shower) and then turned into a statue by some magical or technological means.   Needless to say, this transformation comes as a surprise (probably a rather shocking and unpleasant surprise) to the character depicted.  It’s an intended petrificaton, unlike that which happened to Ashley Madder back in the Apsinthion Protocol, which was an accident.  Sort of.

A large source of these panels can be found at the Medusa Realm here.  One example, from the artist calling verself Eocene, is this.

Kinda twisted, yes?  (Yes! Yes!)  I don’t want to speculate too much about the psychology that drives the creation of images and micro-narratives of this kind.  I do know what drives Iris and her elaborate set-up that leads to doing the same to Professor Mora.  Iris is really mad, and it’s not enough just to dispose of the problem professor.  She wants to humiliate an enemy in the process.

What a process, at that!  Another image from the artist calling verself Rodin.

And Iris’s revenge runs deep, not just because it’s humiliating to find yourself naked when you really shouldn’t be, but because Iris has created a living metaphor:  the process of exposing Professor Mora’s body is at the same time the process of exposing Mora as intellectually fraudulent.  Well done, Iris!

That last is an entry in the micro-genre from the artist calling verself “Drake,” who I think went on to more ambitious projects over at Medusarrific.

Higher superstition

Sometimes the running sores of prior life experience don’t quite heal altogether and thus show up in things we write years or even decades later.

Adherents of the academic movement known as postmodernism, at least with respect to the the poseur attitudes they struck toward science and technology, were the viri that made me break out in such sores for years.  Condescending, glib, smug…and for the most part shockingly ignorant of the substance of what they aimed to criticize. they blighted my academic years and left me with the enduring sense that the academic enterprise was at least in part fraudulent.   So it was perhaps inevitable that I would create a character like Aphrodite Mora and the seminar she runs at Gnosis.

I wish I could point to something erotic about this particular scene, but sadly I find willfully cultivated obscurity something of a turn off.  But I can at least point to a source text for the scene, which is to wit the excellent and witty book shown to the left, especially pp. 54-5 thereof.  Enjoy!

In the sculpture court

So I went image-delving to try to give the reader a bit of visual experience to go along with the narrative of Iris in the sculpture court where she discovers the statue made out of Ashley Madder.  This naturally involved a trip to the Medsua Realm, a great big A.S.F.R.-related site where they do that sort of thing well.

My eye was first attracted to the image at the left, presented on one of  their webfinds pages.   Not much provenance there, unfortunately.  But we do live in a happy Internet era, and there is now a tool called TinEye, which is a reverse image search.  Got an image you’re wondering about?  Well, now you either upload it or just send the URL to TinEye and it will give it a shot for you.  On this image, I was able to turn up that this is a sculpture known as “Femme Eternelle.”  Neat!  (Unsurprisingly, TinEye is now listed on my links bar as one of the Cool Tools, so by all means enjoy it.)

Interesting.  Over to Google image search.  Can I find it larger or better or more like it?  Enter “femme eternelle sculpture” and all sorts of interesting results come back.  Nothing bigger on this one, but something did come up that seemed even better from the perspective of “sculpture court visual experience.”  It’s a woman on a pedestal, indentified only by the title “Une photo d’art.”

That from a French-language blog called The Dreamsland, whose collection of photography is so exquisite that it too is now added to the EroticMadScience blogroll.

Looking good enough to eat

I realize of course that there is no small squick involved in core scene about the adventures of Iris in the Club Cuisine, but that, too, was a scene that boiled up out of some corner of my mind that I saw myself as having no right to ignore.  And I realize that the squick seems likely to continue to pertain, even though Iris comes through hale and sound (or does she?).

That all this should have boiled up is perhaps no accident as well:  cannibalism has a long history of being both a marker of transgression and punishment.  In the long cycle of misdeeds the culminates in the Oresteia, Atreus kills and cooks the sons of Thyestes.  Who can forget the ghastly feast of Ugolino in Canto XXXII of Dante‘s Inferno?  Or a certain notorious scene in Shakespeare‘s, Titus Andronicus?

Where there is horror, someone is bound to exploit for purposes of eros.  It is no accident, surely, that one of the most successful movies of the last few decades features a cannibal who is no primitive, but a scholar so polished and formidable that he cannot but be magnetic, indeed, sexy.

How often have we described someone who looks sexually desirable as “yummy” or “delicious?”  And how often have we really thought about the metaphor that underlies what we have said?  Do perhaps our guts not move within as our eyes move without?

The phenomenon of cannibalism as kink goes back far.  A little recent digging on my part turned up a sonnet, attributed to François de Malherbe (1555 – 1628), discussed in a academic paper here.  I won’t attempt a full translation, since my attempts even at nineteenth-century French prose turn out to be a bit too disappointing to merit my trying my hand at sixteeenth-century French verse, but I’ll give the gist.  The poet invites a woman, in the midst of the meal, to undress and become “dessert,” perhaps not in an entirely figurative sense.  (His compannion is, needless to say, somewhat shocked.)

Là, là!  Pour le dessert, troussez-moy cette cotte,
Viste, chemise et tout, qu’il n’y demeure rien
Qui me puisse empescher de recoignoistre bien
Du plus haut de nombril jusqu’au bas de la motte.
Là, sans vous renfroigner, venez que je vous frotte,
Et me laissez à part tout ce grave maintien
Suis-je pas vostre cœur? estes vous pas le mien?
C’est bien avecque moy qu’il faut faire la sotte!
–Mon cœur, il est bien vray, mais vous en faites trop:
Remettez vous au pas et quitte ce galop.
–Ma belle, baissez moy, c’est à vous de vous taire.
–Ma foy, cela vous gaste au milieu de repas…
–Belle, vous dites vray, mais se pourroit-il faire
De voir un si beau C[on] et ne le [fou]tre pas?

No wonder certain things brew up from deep in the dark parts of my mind.