Not so Amazing Transplant

Strange filmmaker Doris Wishman (1912-2002) certainly deserves a place of honor in the pantheon of weird cinema.  The unusual fact that she was a woman filmmaker who worked in both sexploitation and hardcore (the latter featuring the transcendent Annie Sprinkle) would get her in the door here.  But beyond that, ho would have thought not just to make a nudie-cutie movie, but try to make a sci-fi nudie-cutie movie (really, see Nude on the Moon [1961]).  Or not just to cast a voluptuous star, but the cartoonish (as in 73″) Chesty Morgan in not one but two movies.  (Really!  There’s Deadly Weapons [1973] in which Chesty uses her endowment as a means of assassination, and Double Agent 73 [1974], in which she has a camera installed in, well, you can guess where.)

So obviously it’s worth a look-in to see if there’s some mad science in the œuvre of this unequaled cinéaste.  There is, and it’s depicted just above, even if it is a little disappointing.

The Amazing Transplant is the story, told mostly in a curious unravel-the-mystery flashback structure, of one Arthur Barlen, a shy young man who blackmails a surgeon into transplanting his deceased friend Felix’s superior (supposedly, we don’t really get to see) male member onto him.

This little bit of mad-ish science certainly helps Arthur with certain confidence issues.  For one, it gives him the strength to proposition his sort-of girlfriend, a young woman who appears to enjoy sitting around playing the zither in the nude.

Unfortunately young Arthur has to live with a cinematic conceit that goes back at least as far as The Hands of Orlac (1924), which is that along with transplanted organs comes transplanted bits of personality, and it turns out that the late Felix was characterized by a rather specific and powerful fetish which poor Arthur is ill-equipped to handle.  Things do not go well…

It’s probably best to read this movie as a sort of commentary on the fetishistic nature of male sexuality, at least as perceived by Wishman.  It’s also an opportunity to look at some really hideous interior design.  The doctor’s office, for example:

I swear, James Lileks could have put together an entire extra chapter of his book on how truly awful interior decoration was in the 1970s just by taking screenshots from this movie.

The mad science quotient is surprisingly low given the movie’s medical-horror premise.  We get some very simple operation scenes, and little else.

Probably not a hit unless you’re a Doris Wishman completist or really into movies about penises.  Something Weird does offer an edition.

Bonus early mad science

While we’re on the subject of old cinematic mad science that deserves attention, I should bring up The Man Who Changed His Mind, a 1936 feature that starred Boris Karloff, who had recently given a type-creating performance as Frankenstein’s monster and who now gets to be the mad scientist, “Dr. Laurience.”

Providing appeal here is Anna Lee playing Dr. Clare Wyatt, who goes to assist Laurience, believing him to be (mostly correctly) a misunderstood genius.

Laurience, it turns out, has been working with a mind-transfer technology, which he demonstrates to the skeptical Dr. Wyatt through animal testing (unusual prudence for cinematic mad science!) in a well-done mad scientist laboratory scene.

Things spin out of control, as they have a way of doing in the movies.   An ambitious press baron (literally — he is Lord Haselwood) undertakes to finance Laurience’s work, but when Laurience attempts to present his results to the assembled scientific community, he is laughed off the stage.  The furious Lord Haselwood pulls Laurience’s funding, which causes Laurience to throw caution to the winds by testing his mind transfer device on…Haselwood and Laurience’s own crippled assistant Clayton… with success.   It will get worse for the good characters from there on out, because Laurience is falling in love with Dr. Wyatt…who is in turn attached to Lord Haselwood’s journalist son…

I’m slightly surprised that this movie doesn’t have a higher profile than it appears to have.  Karloff gives a strong performance, though perhaps I’m biased toward sympathy with his character (I’ve had my own moments when I realized that professional failure loomed at the same time as I realized that the One You Love Does Not Love You, resulting in a form of inner anguish I wouldn’t wish on the worst person alive).  And Anna Lee is not just eye candy here.  She plays a character who’s a competent and strong-willed scientist in her own right (the opening scene depicts her performing surgery), and obviously there’s appeal there.  (Plus a plot twist that I’ll run under the fold to avoid spoilers…)

Definitely a film to watch, if you want to know the mad science cinematic canon.  It’s available at the Internet Archive and also embedded below:

Personally appealing bit of trivia: The movie was directed by Robert Stevenson, who would have a long, long career that ended with…The Shaggy D.A., which as I recall is the story of a man who finds his mind in the body of a dog.  So I guess history rhymes here…

Additional personally appealing bit of trivia: Anna Lee would have an even longer career and continue acting into her nineties, which I think is awesome.

Bonus plot element below this fold…

Continue reading

Early and really mad mad science

A movie no aficionado of the history  cinematic mad science science should miss is Dwain Esper‘s Maniac (1934).  It’s a movie that will help you just say no to drugs.  Because with movies like this, who would need drugs?

Oh, it starts out sensibly enough as a simple, innocent tale of your standard-issue mad scientist (“Dr. Meirschultz”) who’ has come up with a chemical formula that will resurrect the dead.  Naturally, he and his assistant Don Maxwell will have to break into the local morgue to test the formula.  Happily, Don Maxwell is an unemployed vaudeville performer who specializes in impersonations, so this is not to difficult.

The morgue itself is is a marvelous high-arched space full of ominous darkness.  I suspect this was because Esper didn’t have the production budget to light the set properly, but the effect still works for me.

Meirscchultz’s “victim” (if that’s the right word for a dead person who you are trying to bring back to life) is a carbon monoxide suicide, who looks like she might have had rather a lot to live for (but what do we know of another’s inner sorrows?).

Mad scientist Meirschultz get right to work.

With success!  The victim is revived, sort of, and smuggled back chez Meirschultz to continue her recuperation.

Unfortunately success goes to Dr. Meirschultz’s head, and on his hubris follows nemesis, as it so often does in the mad science movie.  Wishing to continue his experiments, he hands Maxwell a gun and invites Maxwell to shoot himself, so that he can be the next Meirschultz success.  Bad move, Meirschultz.  Maxwell loses his cool and shoots Meirshcultz instead.

Unfortunately Meirschultz is some sort of psychiatrist in addition to being a mad scientist, and when some of Merischultz’s patients show up, Maxwell decides to try impersonating Meirschultz to keep the law away.

This leads to some unfortunate complications when Maxwell gives one of Meirschultz’s already-unstable patients the wrong injection (of “Superadrenaline”), a screwup which generates The One Drug Freakout Scene to Rule them All.  Said patient then abducts the revived dead girl (possibly — the character is played by an entirely different actress).

He runs off into the woods with her and tears off her dress, leading to a rare post-Code example of on-screen nudity.

(El Santo is hilarious on just how gratuitous this scene is.)

And it only gets stranger from there.  Corpses bricked up in cellars, insane neighbors, more utterly gratuitous scenes of young women lounging around in their undies, bogus “educational” inserts…you cannot miss this one.

Fortunately you don’t have to, because it’s available at the Internet archive.

It’s free, so you can’t ask for your money back.

Update 20111224: I realize that the embedding seemed broken for a long time, but I hope it’s fixed now.

[Faustus May 11, 2018: The embedding apparently broke again, but should now be fixed again, and let’s hope it sticks this time.

Suction

The means through which Bridget O’Brian is abducted from Gnosis are of course implausible and absurd, but since they invoke a cinematic scene so important in my thaumatophile development, I couldn’t really help myself.

The scene is a tribute  — somewhat more explicit one than the original, since Bridget loses all her clothes — to the famous “girl at the piano” scene in Weird Science (1985).  And I know I’ve shown these pictures before, but I still can’t quite help myself.

Writer and director John Hughes died last year, so we can’t inquire as to his inspiration to the scene, though with writing like this I hope he managed to make it to thaumatophile heaven.  Naturally if anyone has any background to add I’d welcome it in comments.

The unnamed girl at the piano was played by Kym Malin, who was Playboy’s Miss May 1982.  As I rolled her famous Weird Science scene around in my head I hit upon a backstory for her indignity:  the gods themselves decided they wanted Kym as a plaything, and so that’s why supernatural winds stripped her naked and sucked her up the chimney.

The gods probably had a point…

State Home

A twisted institution like the State Home for Wayward Girls has obvious cinematic precedents in the women in prison film and, more grimly, in movies like Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS, but it also comes out of a certain dark place with deep roots in my imagination, for I have always had a fear of something that might be described as “the confining institution in which no one gives a fuck about you.”  So while the scenes that take place in the State Home might be a twisted form of erotica, they might also be a product of long-standing fears.  (Perhaps that’s what makes twisted erotica possible.)

As a child, I remember as soon as I acquired the concept of “orphanage” I remember being afraid, really afraid, that if I didn’t behave myself, I might find myself consigned to one.  (I was good.  Believe me, I was good.)  As soon as I understood what a “prison” was I was afraid of it.  Not just of finding myself in one, but of being sent to one and forgotten, so that that I would never be let out.  Don’t even get me started on how repulsive it was to have to register for what the U.S. government euphemistically calls “Selective Service.”

But perhaps, even though the State Home is technically more of a reformatory or juvenile detention center, the institution after which it is most modeled is the insane asylum.  In part, it’s because they are such total institutions where scary things go on.  I own a coffee-table book of photographs by Christopher Payne called Asylum:  Inside the Closed World of State Mental Hospitals, which consists exclusively of pictures taken at, or of, abandoned insane asylums.  The photographs are all beautifully executed.  Some of them haunt me.  Some of them downright scare me.

And there’s something particularly mad science about the insane asylum that a prison or the even the Army doesn’t have.  Because while weirdos like me might fantasize mad science, it seems as if twentieth century psychiatry has been busy figuring out ways to practice it, and on many of society’s most marginal and vulnerable individuals at that.  Mad as I am, I’ve never come up with the idea of shooting high voltages through people’s skulls, or lifting up their eyeballs and chopping up parts of their brains with an icepick, or insinuating “memories” of Satanic ritual abuse into the minds of unhappy people, in the name of therapy.

Small wonder that I find a mad science connection to madness.

Inane asylums also figure importantly in the sort of fantastic literature that was the matrix in which my early strangeness was nourished.

Nobody can ever keep track of these people, and state school officials and census men have a devil of a time. You can bet that prying strangers ain’t welcome around Innsmouth. I’ve heard personally of more’n one business or government man that’s disappeared there, and there’s loose talk of one who went crazy and is out at Danvers now. They must have fixed up some awful scare for that fellow.

–H.P. Lovecraft, “The Shadow over Innsmouth” (1931)

It was with a strange mixture of fear and pleasure that I discovered that “Danvers” was a real and not a fictional place:  the Danvers State Insane Asylum in Massachusetts.  And it was plenty creepy-looking:

So it was an obvious model for the “old building” at the State Home site in which Strangeways conducts his terrible experiments.

Danvers would become the setting for one of my favorite minor horror movies, Session 9, about a crew of workmen hired to remove the asbestos from the abandoned asylum.  Things go very wrong, predictably.

And thus it’s perhaps just as predictable that things will go wrong with Strangeways.

Up against it

There’s a certain special pleasure in being able to write parallel scenes involving some of American society’s most privileged offspring and some of its least privileged that converge on a single erotic image, in this case that of a naked woman squashed up against glass.

I’ve covered some of this material before in a post I wrote at ErosBlog over a year ago, which was prompted by my discovery of this image of actress Yukari Sakurada, up against the glass in some interesting showertime activities.  I’ll re-run the images for the benefit of the new audience.  They’re bigger this time.

The images are bigger, I mean.

Naturally this brought to mind a scene that stuck firm and fast in my mind since I first saw it as a teenager:

The awe-inspiring Uschi Digard putting her natural endowments to good use in the “Catholic High School Girls in Trouble” sequence in Kentucky Fried Movie (1977). A real two-fer, and no I don’t mean in the obvious sense:  I mean in that it served both as a prime inspiration for the parallel scenes in Invisible Girl, Heroine and for the whole concept of Mary Magdalene College.

Well, since we’re into mad science here it means that the research goes on and on, and I’m pleased to note that we can add another image to the collection of inspiration for the scene, this one from Good Luck Chuck (2007).

I’m afraid that even Jessica Alba couldn’t save this film from making Kentucky Fried Movie look urbane by comparison, but we’ll always take what we can get.

IMDB seems to indicate that the actress playing the woman in the shower is named Susan McClellan, but I fear I haven’t more to add.

Tax time

Sorry if productivity has been a little bit on the low side over the past few days, but even mad scientists have to take some time to prepare their taxes, and I’m sure you all know what that’s like.

The agents of the taxation authorities get all shirty when you try to explain the depreciation schedule on your matter tranmogrifier or deductions for plutonium expenses, so doing things right is a big deal.

But fear not.  More material soon…

Kiss me quick

Continuing for a moment the subject of movies in erotic mad science that don’t really do enough with the concept, I should at least note the existence of (and share a few pictures from, naturally) the 1964 nudie-cutie Kiss Me Quick!, one of the first productions of sexploitation king Harry Novak.

A mad scientist named Dr. Breedlove is conducting experiments on young women in his castle.  The purpose of the experiments is unclear, but has something to do with “perfecting” the young women, who don’t seem to be in much need of perfecting if you ask me, but maybe I’m just not insane enough.  In any event, a very dim alien named Sterilox teleports into Breedlove’s mad-lab with the aim of bringing back with him a “perfect specimen,” for purposes of…manual labor on his homeworld (told you he was dim).  Mostly the movie is, like most nudie-cuties, an excuse for its comely female cast members to wiggle around fetchingly wearing as little as the law and custom of the time would allow.

Still, there is some appeal to the mad-science setting does carry some appeal.  Breedlove has built as sex machine (of course) of which his assistant Kissme is rather fond.   Here, Breedlove admonishes her never to use the sex machine when he is not around:  “You’re going to sex yourself out of the world, one of these days.”

Personally I think this might have been a much more interesting movie had Kissme gone ahead and done exactly that, but I wasn’t around in 1964 to be asked about it.

Aside from pretty girls and lab equipment, there are always Breedlove’s lunatic pronouncements to help carry us through the movie.  A personal favorite:  “Don’t be alarmed girls.  I had you forcefully [sic] abducted and brought here to my castle for your own good.  You’ll see.  Just just continue to do as I’ll say, and I’ll make you like you always dreamed you would be made.”

Really.

So not a complete waste of time for the thaumatophile.  There’s even now a DVD from Something Weird Video in which you can hear commentary from Harry Novak himself.

Electrical effects

Time for another little breather while I get to work putting together Invisible Girl, Heroine for publication to the wider world.  In the meantime, for your enjoyment…

I suggested a little while back that Fred Olen Ray might have something to offer us thaumatophiles in the form of a new movie called Bikini Frankenstein.  I plunked down the cash and I had high hopes, but on the whole, meh…  Not that there isn’t lots of well-filmed and enthusiastically-acted softcore sex involving very pretty people.  Fine if you like that sort of thing, but I couldn’t help somehow feeling like the whole mad-scientist angle was underdeveloped.

Save for one scene, though, in which Dr. Frankenstein brings his creature, played by Jayden Cole to life, which involves some nice…electrical effects.

And you know how us would-be mad scientist types really like electrical effects!

On the whole, though, I think I still prefer a rather more classic sort of Frankenstein parody.

Ah, now that’s more like it.

More locker-room snooping

Maureen takes advantage of her ability to be invisible to find an unusual scene, and an unusual gratification.

A story from Dr. Faustus’s life lies behind this scene (sadly, one less interesting than I’m sure many of you readers promptly thought of).  Here is the background:  I spent adolescence surrounded by nice, well brought-up Christian girls whose attitude toward erotic materials was “Porn!  Icky poo!  Baby Jesus cries!”  And then I went off to college and found myself amongst outstanding, well-educated college women whose attitude toward erotica was “Porn!  Icky poo!  Degrades women!”

And then at about 21 or so I found myself in the company of a lady companion who told me — perhaps a little bashfully — about who incredibly horny she found herself watching a gay male porn movie.

It was a revelatory moment.  And Maureen’s invisible girl voyeurism is a tribute to that revelation.

In retrospect it should not have been so surprising.  The athlete is one form of extraordinary human perfection, and thereby loaded with erotic interest.  The Greeks, in their Olympic games, understood this fact perfectly well.

And significantly, the modern Olympics have always been freighted with both heteroerotic and homoerotic interest.  There is a goofy fun pre-code Hollywood movie about which I have blogged before called The Search for Beauty (1934), which pus beauty on display in (among many other ways) the form of Buster Crabbe in the shower.

Naturally, the whole fun them will find its way to Japan, where it will be exploited in anime.

(Note:  what an awesome era we live in!  You google image search on “gay hentai locker room” and you get “gay hentai locker room.”  187,000 results in 0.07 seconds, when I tried it.)

With the beautiful boys going at it in the locker room, there’s a thought that stands out for me, which I might attribute to my lady companion of all those years ago, or to Maureen for that matter.

Quite.